找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Structures in Science; Heuristic Patterns B Theo A. F. Kuipers Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 ethics.philosophy.philos

[复制链接]
楼主: fallacy
发表于 2025-3-23 13:08:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:29:12 | 显示全部楼层
0166-6991 only a few 25 years. synthetic monographs and advanced textbooks have appeared in the last The philosophy of science seems to have lost its self-confidence. The main reason for such a loss is that the traditional analytical, logical-empiricist approaches to the philosophy of science had to make a n
发表于 2025-3-23 18:50:34 | 显示全部楼层
Research Programs and Research Strategies and Lakatos. Kuhn first preferred the term ‘paradigm’ and later ‘disciplinary matrix’ (Kuhn, 1962/1969). Lakatos (1970, 1978) introduced the notion of a ‘research program’. Half a dozen other terms are used to denote roughly the same concept, although their details may differ.
发表于 2025-3-23 22:12:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:31:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:37:09 | 显示全部楼层
‘Default-Norms’ in Research Ethicscteristic of the factual relation, but also as desirable, that is, in the interest of science and society, of course, under rationally defensible conditions. It concerns in particular moral dilemmas with respect to:
发表于 2025-3-24 13:23:47 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2001w 25 years. synthetic monographs and advanced textbooks have appeared in the last The philosophy of science seems to have lost its self-confidence. The main reason for such a loss is that the traditional analytical, logical-empiricist approaches to the philosophy of science had to make a number of c
发表于 2025-3-24 17:41:44 | 显示全部楼层
Observational Laws and Proper Theoriestinction in a defensible way. Without doubt, the distinction is strongly related to the distinction between observational (or empirical or experimental) and theoretical terms. Whereas proper theories introduce theoretical terms, observational laws do not. But how can one make sense of this term-dist
发表于 2025-3-24 19:10:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:54:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 22:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表