Titlebook: Statistical Science in the Courtroom; Joseph L. Gastwirth Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 likelihood.probability.p

包裹

Issues Arising in the Use of Statistical Evidence in Discrimination Cases,uring the last twenty-five years, more statisticians are becoming involved as expert witnesses and consultants. Potential experts should be aware of difficulties and pitfalls arising from the adversarial nature of legal proceedings. In particular, an expert needs to be involved early in the proceedi

Small-Intestine

某人

Judicial Review of Statistical Analyses in Environmental Rulemakings, their rulemakings, but then defer to the agencies once this certain-looking information is provided. In this article the author argues that these demands by the courts are not only unrealistic, but they provide agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with perverse incentives to adop

预示

Statistical Testimony on Damages in ,,ompanies, and two tobacco trade groups (“Tobacco”) alleging that the defendants had acted fraudulently, conspired to prevent development of a less hazardous cigarette, and violated a public trust to communicate accurately about the health effects of smoking. After a four-month trial, the judge instr

容易懂得

CRUE

Cirrhosis

沉着

Death and Deterrence: Notes on a Still Inchoate Judicial Inquiry,The article examines two highly influential statistical studies, one done by sociologist Thorsten Sellin in 1959 and the other by economist Isaac Ehrlich in 1975 and uses both studies to illustrate the kinds of questions the courts can and should ask of quantitative studies in this area.

盲信者

逢迎白雪

Interpretation of Evidence, and Sample Size Determination,ge consignment of material to determine the proportion that contains illegal substances. A Bayesian approach is used, and inferences are presented in probabilistic terms, with due account taken of prior beliefs and the outcome of the sampling process.