Titlebook: State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation; The Differential Eff Brian K. Chappell Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

malcontented

书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation网络公开度




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation被引频次




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation被引频次学科排名




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation年度引用




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation年度引用学科排名




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation读者反馈




书目名称State Responses to Nuclear Proliferation读者反馈学科排名

Acquired

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59801-3nuclear weapons; non-proliferation; threat perceptions; pre-emptive war; preventive war; political psycho

Heresy

fledged

Cognitive Psychological Influences,This chapter examines the cognitive psychological influences that shape dominant state threat perceptions and their proliferation responses. Because the methodology incorporates variables that influence a powerful state’s operational milieu, descriptive data illustrates the importance of these influences.

Favorable

The Middle East States and Threat Perceptions,Adversarial rhetoric has a cognitive influence on the power projecting state decision-makers’ threat perceptions and how they perceive the intent of the non-nuclear-weapon state’s proliferation ambitions.

重力

Conclusion,This book explored the role threat perceptions play in state responses to nuclear proliferation by conducting a comparative analysis of the United States and Israel over four case studies: Iraq (1981 and 2003), Syria (2007), and Iran (2015).

助记

概观

Erythropoietin

National Security Policy and Nuclear Policy,vide the foundation for how a state will conduct its foreign policy, address threats, and promote its values and economic well-being. A state’s nuclear policy provides the governing philosophies of its nuclear arsenal, primarily concerning their security and conditions under which nuclear weapons could be employed.

Fantasy

Military Doctrine and Power Projection,ntional, military, ground war on the territory of a potential target state,” and argues the “ability to bomb a state alone without a corresponding ability to put boots on the ground in that state’s territory is not a sufficient power-projection capability”.