Titlebook: Standards of Futures Research; Guidelines for Pract Lars Gerhold,Dirk Holtmannspötter,Axel Zweck Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

树上结蜜糖

Practical Relevance, Usefulness, and Effectiveness”), future researchers can produce well-founded results that add to the knowledge base (“Scientific Relevance”). Yet findings are practically relevant, useful, and effective only if they meet the knowledge requirements of the funder and are utilizable by all the pertinent actors.

Ligament

Modify

Aligning the Research with Ambitions for Actionater reference. Second, they choose an appropriate research design and then construct images of the future whose scope, time horizon, and decision-making parameters are in keeping with the principles of good scientific practice. Third, they carry out a research impact assessment to gauge the potential consequences of the work.

小卒

Objectives and Framework Conditionsled intended purposes. Clear objectives are also important given the risk of contradictory aims or potentially hidden agendas. In a similar vein, the background and framework conditions governing the decision to undertake a project should be illuminated, as these conditions impose resource and methodological constraints.

pessimism

Book 2022 These results in fundamental peculiarities have to be taken into account in the conception of studies and in practical research work. The contributions to this anthology offer guidance for scientists and practitioners and describe the criteria and standards by which the quality of results and proce

过时

Images of the Futuresense imaginative: their portraits are not representations of an already determined state of affairs; rather, they are constructions that rely on empirically unverifiable presuppositions in the present to envision a future that has yet to happen. The future, after all, is fundamentally open and cont

天然热喷泉

Modalitys (. and .) are explorative, the third (.) is normative. Good researchers make a clear distinction between these three modalities, not only in each stage of the research project, but also when communicating their findings.

motivate

Validation by Argumentationation, such as empirical proof in experiments and measurements or logical deduction from known knowledge, are not applicable to futures studies. Instead, one may apply structural analogies from the . to conceptualize the argumentative validation of knowledge about the future and to underpin it with

全面

Aligning the Research with Ambitions for ActionFirst, they gather information about the actual practical interests underlying the research question and, importantly, document this information for later reference. Second, they choose an appropriate research design and then construct images of the future whose scope, time horizon, and decision-mak

影响深远