找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Standard Setting in Education; The Nordic Countries Sigrid Blömeke,Jan-Eric Gustafsson Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

[复制链接]
查看: 36282|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 16:47:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Standard Setting in Education
副标题The Nordic Countries
编辑Sigrid Blömeke,Jan-Eric Gustafsson
视频video
概述Bridges the gap between highly complex methodological issues and policy implications.Reflects the status of standard-setting approaches implemented in many European countries with suggestions how to p
丛书名称Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment
图书封面Titlebook: Standard Setting in Education; The Nordic Countries Sigrid Blömeke,Jan-Eric Gustafsson Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth
描述.This book summarizes the international evidence on methodological issues in standard setting in education. By critically discussing the standard-setting practices implemented in the Nordic countries and by presenting new methodological approaches, it offers fresh perspectives on the current research. .Standard setting targets crucial societal objectives by defining educational benchmarks at different achievement levels, and provides feedback to policy makers, schools and teachers about the strengths and weaknesses of a school system. Given that the consequences of standard setting can be dramatic, the quality of standard setting is a prime concern. If it fails, repercussions can be expected in terms of arbitrary evaluations of educational policy, wrong turns in school or teacher development or misplacement of individual students. Standard setting therefore needs to be accurate, reliable, valid, useful, and defensible. . .However, specific evidence on the benefits and limits of different approaches to standard setting is rare and scattered, and there is a particular lack with respect to standard setting in the Nordic countries, where the number of national tests is increasing and t
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Methods of standard setting; National tests; Research on standard setting; Defining achievement levels;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-84508-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-50856-6Series ISSN 2367-170X Series E-ISSN 2367-1718
issn_series 2367-170X
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Standard Setting in Education影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Standard Setting in Education影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Standard Setting in Education网络公开度




书目名称Standard Setting in Education网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Standard Setting in Education被引频次




书目名称Standard Setting in Education被引频次学科排名




书目名称Standard Setting in Education年度引用




书目名称Standard Setting in Education年度引用学科排名




书目名称Standard Setting in Education读者反馈




书目名称Standard Setting in Education读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:35:02 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-84508-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
发表于 2025-3-22 03:10:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:05:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:15:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:55:54 | 显示全部楼层
2367-170X emented in many European countries with suggestions how to p.This book summarizes the international evidence on methodological issues in standard setting in education. By critically discussing the standard-setting practices implemented in the Nordic countries and by presenting new methodological app
发表于 2025-3-22 18:40:29 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2017ing practices implemented in the Nordic countries and by presenting new methodological approaches, it offers fresh perspectives on the current research. .Standard setting targets crucial societal objectives by defining educational benchmarks at different achievement levels, and provides feedback to
发表于 2025-3-23 01:10:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:31:10 | 显示全部楼层
Using Empirical Results to Validate Performance Standardsation/use argument (IUA) for the underlying score scale. For standards-based interpretations and uses to be valid, this additional inference needs to be justified. The supporting evidence can be procedural, internal, and criterion-based. Criterion-based evidence is especially important in high-stake
发表于 2025-3-23 05:33:50 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 03:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表