Titlebook: Stalinism in a Russian Province; Collectivization and James Hughes Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

现代

鞭打

2946-8728 e Soviet countryside. Rather than a bipolarized conflict between state and peasant, he profiles the socially variegated response of different peasant groups to collectivization and dekulakization and argues that it was as much a process involving social conflict between peasants.978-0-230-37998-5Series ISSN 2946-8728 Series E-ISSN 2946-8736

向外才掩饰

赦免

要素

Capturing the Peasantry,ransom by the peasantry’s manipulation of NEP’s relatively liberalized commerce. During the mid-1920s there was a ‘green revolution’ in parts of the Soviet Union, as peasants responded to the market economy by a rapid expansion in the production of cash crops, primarily grain. Nowhere is the commerc

名字的误用

Mobilizing Social Influence,ound in desperation for some new method to accelerate grain procurement other than falling back on outright emergency measures. The answer decided upon was to put the regional party organization on an emergency status and extend measures of ‘social influence’ on the peasantry, in particular by the l

Baffle

The Search for a New Method,aborated in much detail and had not produced the massive procurement level needed to complete the plan. Two months had passed without a breakthrough. The party leadership was haunted by the prospect of a repeat of the events of the previous year when the import of 200,000 tons of grain during the sp

喷油井

高贵领导

encomiast

A Prologue of Repression,61 against kulaks, the party leadership decided to widen its catchment and entrench its use against the peasantry. On 3 June a Sovnarkom RSFSR circular ordered its application in all areas except those in the south where again there had been a harvest failure. The aim was to collect as much grain as