找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Similar Practice, Different Rationales; Political Fact-Check Laurens Lauer Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[复制链接]
查看: 30601|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 18:45:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales
副标题Political Fact-Check
编辑Laurens Lauer
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Similar Practice, Different Rationales; Political Fact-Check Laurens Lauer Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under
描述.Misinformation and disinformation have emerged as paramount societal challenges, affecting areas from public health to climate change and eroding both social understanding and democratic values. Enter the political fact-checkers: stalwart defenders of accurate public information and guardians of robust public discourse. What began as an endeavor to verify political claims in the U.S. has transformed into a global movement addressing diverse forms of public information, harnessing innovative tech tools, championing media literacy, and exploring governance solutions. Who are these fact-checkers, and how have they become such a versatile force against misinformation? While united by very similar verification practices, the community of fact-checkers is remarkably diverse. Reflecting the media-political landscapes they navigate, these initiatives bring together a spectrum of professional expertise, visions, and strategies. This book delves into this fascinating world, exploring how theconcept of fact-checking has proliferated globally. Spotlighting efforts in Argentina, Georgia, Italy, and the U.S., it offers an in-depth understanding of fact-checkers‘ approaches, their alignment with
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Democracy; Mis- & Disinformation; Fact-checking; Media Systems; Public Information & Debate; Comparative
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43527-1
isbn_softcover978-3-658-43526-4
isbn_ebook978-3-658-43527-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wies
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales网络公开度




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales被引频次




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales被引频次学科排名




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales年度引用




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales年度引用学科排名




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales读者反馈




书目名称Similar Practice, Different Rationales读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:34:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:57:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:15:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:46:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:05:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:21:05 | 显示全部楼层
Laurens Lauertudy is designed as an experiment in reality, in which the independent variable is a specific didactic approach based on a vertical variation in children’s reflections in different teaching situations. Since the experiment is conducted in the everyday setting, it is necessary to violate the rules of
发表于 2025-3-23 00:34:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:16:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:29:10 | 显示全部楼层
Laurens Lauerfor learners towards higher levels of thinking and learning. The research described in this paper involved an investigation of the implementation of digital media into a New South Wales Year 9/10 IST (Information and Software Technology) elective course. It concentrated on the subsequent assessment
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 21:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表