Titlebook: Should the Patient Know the Truth?; A Response of physic Samuel Standard (Associate Professor of Clinical S Book 1955 Springer Science+Busi

招人嫉妒

ureter

蚊帐

Other Times, Other Fears,of the family members should be informed. On the other hand, I remember the times when no physician ever told his patient that he had tuberculosis because it was thought that this information would undermine the patient’s confidence in recovery. I have an open mind whether in the field of cancer an

anachronistic

What One Neurosurgeon Does,is health and very existence to another physician. With this picture constantly and vividly in his mind, the doctor will endeavor to treat any patient before him as he himself would like to be treated if he should be in the patient’s place. Good doctors, however, are all kinds of good people, and th

案发地点

无力更进

Sympathy and Objectivity in Balance,ld apply in all cases. The patient’s attitude toward this question will be determined by his age, experience, endowment, philosophy, and temperament. To the patient, his illness is a very personal matter, sometimes to the apparent exclusion of all other responsibilities. The patient who has the grea

包裹

怒目而视

,The Priest’s Response,rmed of the approach of death?” The other is more particular and, I suspect, more provocative of discussion: “Should the patient know the precise nature of his disease? Should he be told, for example, he has cancer?”

Mhc-Molecule

cloture