Titlebook: Shifting Perspectives on the European Public Prosecutor‘s Office; Willem Geelhoed,Leendert H. Erkelens,Arjen W.H. Me Book 2018 T.M.C. Asse

MONY

Evolve

Towards an Inconsistent European Regime of Cross-Border Evidence: The EPPO and the European Investigin EPPO investigations might be beneficial for various reasons. It might increase the acceptance of the EIO in practice, the trust in future EPPO investigations, the recognition of EPPO-evidence and the coherence of cross-border investigations in the EU in general.

千篇一律

Relations Between the EPPO and Eurojust—Still a Privileged Partnership?n. The analysis reveals that it is at the moment difficult to consider Eurojust as the EPPO’s privileged partner. A better clarification of their bilateral relations should be included in the draft proposals, and Eurojust’s expertise should be better taken into consideration. A further clarification

抗原

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: A Chronicle of a Failure Foreseeniveness and its cooperation with other organizations demand for such an approach. The issue ‘Is that value for money for EU citizens’ should be an important element of a multi-disciplinary audit by ECA on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mechanism such as EPPO. The most probable outcome

MURAL

Book 2018 greater impact on the European criminal justice system than.the European Arrest Warrant ever did..Dr. Willem Geelhoed .is Assistant Professor in criminal law and criminal procedure.at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, and Drs. Leendert H. Erkelens.and Prof. Mr. Arjen W.H. Meij are both

向下

Malleable

Afflict

修饰语

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-216-3EU Substantive Law; Procedural Criminal Law; Combatting EU Fraud; European Law Enforcement; Distribution

GUILE