找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Shakespeare Studies Today; Romanticism Lost Edward Pechter Book 2011 Edward Pechter 2011 Autorschaft.English literature.Romanticism.William

[复制链接]
楼主: 误解
发表于 2025-3-27 00:40:45 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Romanticism Lostowledges that any such claim is “impossible to prove” by “objective criteria.” A comparable amount of high-quality work is focused on other periods as well—“Baroque, renaissance, or medieval topics,” for example—but de Man insists nonetheless that Romanticism is a special case:
发表于 2025-3-27 03:36:33 | 显示全部楼层
critical practice is problematically if not dangerously low, and the qualities which the Romantics valued in an engagement with Shakespeare are either ignored these days or fundamentally misunderstood.978-1-349-29581-4978-0-230-11936-9
发表于 2025-3-27 06:29:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:43:28 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2011n on which to build our work.  This book asserts that among Shakespeareans at present, the level of conviction required to sustain a healthy critical practice is problematically if not dangerously low, and the qualities which the Romantics valued in an engagement with Shakespeare are either ignored
发表于 2025-3-27 16:34:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 20:03:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:49:05 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Discipline and Desire particular the kind undertaken by the members of English departments and, more particularly still, by the Shakespeareans inhabiting these (and sometimes theater) departments. The word has no direct connection with inflicting or receiving pain, and any indirect connection, while perhaps interesting
发表于 2025-3-28 04:55:03 | 显示全部楼层
Return of the Aesthetic?it of the voice crying in the wilderness, but this wilderness is well populated with other voices; a significant number of critics have, in recent years, been similarly lamenting our apostasy from (or at least “losing sight of”) the core values of our discipline—the experience of “literary power,” w
发表于 2025-3-28 08:52:42 | 显示全部楼层
Negative Desire: Materialism and Its Discontentswe keep trying. Disciplinary inertia must be an issue again, pulling now in the opposite direction from where it was pushing earlier on: instead of preventing us from a return to aesthetics, it prevents us from dropping the project. (As Kuhn says, humanists tend to throw nothing out.) But inertia ca
发表于 2025-3-28 11:24:34 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: What’s Wrong with Literature?., et al.), produced by the British publisher Orion. Orion’s publicity touts the “passionate romance, thrilling adventure, arresting characters and unforgettable scenes and situations” available in “the great classics,” but acknowledges that “finding time to read them can be a problem” (66). Gopnik
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-13 02:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表