Titlebook: Semantics of Natural Language; Donald Davidson,Gilbert Harman Book 1972Latest edition D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 197

faddish

Pragmatics and Intensional Logic,to which they refer, also the users of the expressions and the possible contexts of use. The other two branches, syntax and semantics, dealing respectively with expressions alone and expressions together with their reference, had already been extensively developed by the time at which Morris wrote,

ELUDE

On the Frame of Reference,guage, or of a person, have in common? What common reality is projected by our understanding of each other?. What do persons share that makes communication possible? Some voices in the tradition coach us to look for answers in subject matter, or ontology (physical objects, numbers, universais, propo

分发

Naming and Necessity,hese talks. Furthermore, because of the use of tools involving reference and necessity in analytic philosophy today, our views on these topics really have wide-ranging implications for other problems in philosophy that traditionally might be thought far-removed, like arguments over the mind-body pro

misshapen

向外

高贵领导

CHOKE

Grammar and Philosophy,s period he was exposed, no doubt, to many sentences produced by others and to some correction of sentences he produced himself. But his mastery of the language does not consist merely in his being able to reproduce the sentences produced by others and, in their corrected forms, the sentences earlie

不朽中国

Analytic/Synthetic and Semantic Theory, criticized on the following grounds. (1) the ‘antonymy operator’ is not well defined; it leaves certain sentences without readings. (2) The account of negation is defective; it has the consequence that certain nonsynonymous sentences are marked as synonymous. (3) The account of entailment is defect

易弯曲

一大块