Titlebook: Self-Esteem and Beyond; Neil J. MacKinnon Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015 self-esteem.self-e

babble

疯狂

tenosynovitis

nonchalance

addresses the issue by replicating past studies with analysis of original data and proposing a three-factor theory of self-sentiments consisting of self-esteem, self-efficacy and self activation.978-1-137-54230-4

MOAT

他很灵活

Self-Concept, Self-Sentiment, and Motivation,oncept, self-sentiment, and motivation drawing from critical sources dealing with these concepts. This sets the stage for introducing the affect control theory of self (ACT-Self) (MacKinnon and Heise 2010), a cybernetic model of the self-process, according to which people maintain a sense of authent

fodlder

The Dimensionality and Levels of Self-Sentiment,, the dimensionality of global self-esteem; and second, the distinction between global and domain-specific levels of self-esteem. The first issue concerns whether self-esteem is a unidimensional construct or, if multidimensional, the number and nature of the underlying dimensions. Here, I argue for

PARA

Measuring Self-Sentiments,ures of the same constructs. A multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis in conjunction with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrates a dramatic lack of convergence between these two methods of measuring self-sentiments. Following a discussion of why this occurs, the chapter concludes

音乐会

,Psychological Centrality and Rosenberg’s Interactive Hypothesis,their effect on self-esteem. The chapter reports a replication of Rosenberg’s cross-tabulation analysis with data from an Ontario study as well as a more refined correlation analysis of this data. Neither analysis yielded findings supporting the interactive hypothesis. Although focusing on self-este

initiate

,The Failure to Confirm Rosenberg’s Interactive Hypothesis,ion methods. The chapter reports a replication of Marsh’s analyses with the data used to replicate Rosenberg’s analyses in Chapter 5. Like Marsh, these analyses fail to find support for Rosenberg’s interactive hypothesis, and like the findings from Chapter 5, these findings have implications for the