Titlebook: Selected Chinese Cases on the UN Sales Convention (CISG) Vol. 1; Peng Guo,Haicong Zuo,Shu Zhang Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

esoteric

Lobotomy

提升

Shenzhen Fengshen Industrial Development Co., Ltd v France Eurasian International Technology Develoo., Ltd, concluded a contract for the purchase of brooches, stipulating that the goods’ total amount was FFR540,630, delivered by CIF Hong Kong, and packed in wooden boxes. On 20 May 1998, the brooches under the contract were delivered to Hong Kong. After receiving the goods, the buyer accepted the

agonist

Shanghai Weijie Electronic Devices Ltd v Superpower Supply Inc,the contract was performed was within the jurisdiction of our court. After the case was filed and accepted on 28 November 2000, our court formed a collegial panel according to law and held three public hearings on 29 August 2002, 15 January 2003 and 25 April 2003. The plaintiff’s entrusted agent att

chemical-peel

典型

小隔间

龙虾

显微镜

Sino-Add (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Karawasha Resources Ltd,ed KLR/2001/02. The contract agreed that the buyer would purchase from the seller 60,000 tons of iron ore originating in India (±10% of the buyer’s choice), and the port of loading would be Panaji Port or Mormugao Port (India), and the unloading port is China (the specific port was to be confirmed).

有恶臭

Lianhe Enterprise (US) Ltd v Yantai Branch of Shandong Foreign Trade Co,ng 80 units, there were 20 units which were not inspected by USDA and there were 60 units which had quality problems found by USDA. On 25 February 1998, Yantai Company filed a lawsuit in Shandong High People’s Court, claiming that Lianhe Company should pay the remaining price and compensate for its losses.