Titlebook: Selbstbewusstsein; Dieter Henrich und d Manfred Frank,Jan Kuneš Book 2022 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert d

Grasping

inconceivable

杂役

agglomerate

Einleitung,s to a theory of self-consciousness, especially in the 1960s and 1970s, he forcefully contradicted the prevailing anti-subjectivism of the Heidegger-Gadamer tradition, but he also developed a powerful critique of the ‚Linguistic Turn‘ which had led to a philosophical narrowing of analytic philosophy

散开

Die frühe Selbstbewusstseinstheorie Dieter Henrichst attempts to avoid a circular definition of self-consciousness and the reasons for why Henrich finally abandoned this project in the early eighties. It outlines Henrich’s actual concept of subjectivity and shows that the continuity with his early theory lies mostly in certain key elements (“Motiven

浸软

MELD

Ist Selbstbewusstsein ein ‚anonymes Feld‘ oder eine ‚wissende Selbstbeziehung‘?ry focus of this analysis was on how to avoid problems of circularity and vicious regresses when dealing with the apersonal ‚dimension‘ of consciousness over the knowing relation of an actively cognitive principle to itself. In my own research I would like to continue along this latter path.

grudging

Subjektivität in Raum und Zeit – mit Blick auf Dieter Henrichested in the cognitively demanding variant of self-consciousness, which, moreover, he conceives with Fichte irreferentially and supra-individually as . so that as well the ordinary referential self-consciousness of corporeal subjects is theoretically neglected. The article attempts, with affirmative

连锁,连串

The Heidelberg School and the Limits of Reflection-called . (Henrich, Frank, Cramer and Pothast). I next present the positive account of self-awareness that one can find in this group of German philosophers, before I in my conclusion draw attention to some of its phenomenological limitations.

僵硬