Titlebook: Scientific Progress; A Study Concerning t Craig Dilworth Book 19943rd edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 Karl R. Popper

多山

施魔法

hangdog

figurine

The Basis of the Popperian Conception of Science, on the other hand, is on the basis of falsifiability. For Popper, if there is no conceivable way that a statement can be shown to be false, while it might still be considered meaningful, it is not scientific but ‘metaphysical’

RENAL

滑动

The Perspectivist Conception of Science,n it is to be empirically determined whether such . also have property .. A number of these .’s are thus to be observed and found either to have or not to have this property. There is no middle way—on this view either the predicate . is applicable or it is not, and if not, the law or theory is considered false

打算

The Set-Theoretic Conception of Science,heory dynamics, has been further developed by J. D. Sneed in his book . (1971). In this book Sneed attempts to reconstruct Newtonian particle mechanics in such a way as to clarify the role of theoretical terms in science, and to provide a conception of how scientific theories can rationally evolve in the face of recalcitrant data

DENT

不出名

0166-6991 hat successive scientific theories are logicallyincommensurable. This edition includes four new appendices in whichthe central ideas of the book are applied to subatomic physics, thedistinction between laws and theories, the relation between absoluteand relative conceptions of space, and the environ

痛得哭了