Titlebook: Science in Flux; Joseph Agassi Book 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1975 Karl R. Popper.history of science.realism.t

Defect

书目名称Science in Flux影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Science in Flux影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Science in Flux网络公开度




书目名称Science in Flux网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Science in Flux被引频次




书目名称Science in Flux被引频次学科排名




书目名称Science in Flux年度引用




书目名称Science in Flux年度引用学科排名




书目名称Science in Flux读者反馈




书目名称Science in Flux读者反馈学科排名

亵渎

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1810-4Karl R; Popper; history of science; realism; theory of science

glans-penis

闹剧

conception

Modified Conventionalism,er’s capacity. It is important, therefore, to distinguish between a philosopher’s desiderata. In different stages of his career, a philosopher may consider different desiderata and assume they do not conflict; but this assumption may be false.

他很灵活

Unity and Diversity in Science,her dangerous one..The Popperian view of rationality as a goal directed, i.e., as problem-solving, method of trial and error is a better view or rationality..Solutions to problems offer the element of unification, and their criticisms offer the element of diversification.

mastopexy

灰心丧气

GEST

0068-0346 Overview: 978-90-277-0612-6978-94-010-1810-4Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

草本植物

When Should we Ignore Evidence in Favour of a Hypothesis?,There is a supposition behind the title question: when should we ignore evidence in favour of a hypothesis? The supposition is, sometimes we may do so, sometimes we may not. Some philosophers have explicitly rejected this supposition, others have implicitly rejected it. Let me outline the brief history of this point.