Titlebook: Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy; Finn Collin Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Naturalization.Philosophy of sc

使残废

LATHE

不可磨灭

Bruno Latour and Actor Network Theory,logy to the micro-approach of anthropological fieldwork. Latour’s celebrated studies at the Salk laboratories in San Diego revealed science to be a matter of the “organization of persuasion through literary inscriptions”. At the macro-level, science is represented as a process though which credit is

ANIM

拱形大桥

Andrew Pickering and the Mangle of Practice, science as generated by a .. This metaphor accentuates the practical or instrumental aspect of science: Science is an attempt to achieve “machinic capture” of nature’s agency by means of cultural tools and resources. In such capture, a stable interaction between physical nature and human resources

浓缩

Steve Fuller and Social Epistemology,rvey of the development of STS itself and offers advice concerning its future development. Social Epistemology carries on the . agenda of classical epistemology, which, according to Fuller, has been abandoned in orthodox STS. Fuller shares STS’s critical attitude to traditional philosophy of science

争论

有说服力

Book 2011d traces the historical roots of the discipline back to developments emerging after World War II. It also presents it as an heir to a long trend in Western thought towards the naturalization of philosophy, where a priori modes of thought are replaced by empirical ones. Finally, it points to ways for Science Studies to proceed in the future.

freight

0166-6991 of Science and Technology Studies that makes this phenomenonThis book approaches its subject matter in a way that combines a strong analytical and critical perspective with a historical and sociological framework for the understanding of the emergence of Science Studies. This is a novelty, since ext

CONE

Book 2011rk for the understanding of the emergence of Science Studies. This is a novelty, since extant literature on this topic tends either to narrate the history of the field, with little criticism, or to criticize Science Studies from a philosophical platform but with little interest in its historical and