Titlebook: Schelling’s Reception in Nineteenth-Century British Literature; Giles Whiteley Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2

LOPE

The Plagiarism Controversy, key documents in this plagiarism controversy by figures including Thomas de Quincey, Julius Hare and James Ferrier, amongst others. The chapter continues the stakes of this debate both in Anglo-Scottish critical relations during the period, and in terms of the role played by this controversy in sha

沙漠

insolence

evince

Schelling and British Theology, break with Schelling on theological grounds, before considering the significance of his theology on the Anglo-Coleridgeans. The chapter then examines the various theological discourses that each claimed Schelling as their own at various times during the period. It focuses on Anglo-Catholics such as

Employee

The Legacies of , and British Science, ways in which British Romantic science responded to . and prompted new developments in it. The chapter then turns to consider Schelling’s role in the development of evolutionary theory, first through Joseph Henry Green and Richard Owen, and then, in the figures of William Whewell and, more diffusel

atopic-rhinitis

Schelling and the British Universities,ically by both sides in the debate over university reform during the middle of the nineteenth century. The chapter then considers the ways in which Schelling found a number of sympathetic readers in the universities of the period, particularly in London and Manchester. The concluding part of the cha

Nomogram

Schelling in British Mythological and Aesthetic Literature,ced by Schelling’s early philosophy of mythology, and his coining of the term ‘tautegory’, one which Schelling himself would later adopt for his own use. The chapter then considers Max Müller, who had studied with Schelling, and whose theories of comparative mythology and language were influenced by

Carcinogenesis

Encapsulate

gain631

,Schelling’s Reception in Scotland , 1817–1833,Munich, and his more famous brother, Thomas Carlyle, who Schelling himself read. The chapter concludes with a major rereading of Carlyle’s great ironic novel, ., problematising the standard Fichtean approaches to the work.