Titlebook: Scalable Uncertainty Management; 7th International Co Weiru Liu,V. S. Subrahmanian,Jef Wijsen Conference proceedings 2013 Springer-Verlag B

mitten

Conference proceedings 2013C, USA, in September 2013. The 26 revised full papers and 3 revised short papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 57 submissions. The papers cover topics in all areas of managing and reasoning with substantial and complex kinds of uncertain, incomplete or inconsistent information including

斗志

jeopardize

Indolent

Modelling Uncertainty in Persuasionponent. We show that the advantage of the second strategy is that on average it results in shorter dialogues than the first strategy, and the advantage of the third strategy is that under some general circumstances the participant can always win the dialogue.

串通

Bipolar Possibility Theory as a Basis for a Logic of Desires and Beliefsire that does not only account for satisfactoriness but also for its epistemic possibility. In the second part of the paper we show that possibility theory offers a semantic basis for developing a modal logic of beliefs and desires.

Largess

Visual-Acuity

A Conditional Logic-Based Argumentation Frameworkovers usual inconsistency-based conflicts and puts in light a specific form of conflicts that often occurs in real-life: when an agent asserts an . rule, it can be argued that additional conditions are actually needed to derive the conclusion.

用肘

Ranking-Based Semantics for Argumentation Frameworkstarget but does not kill it, ii) the number of attackers has a great impact on the acceptability of an argument. We start by proposing a set of rational postulates that such semantics could satisfy, then construct various semantics that enjoy them.

Overthrow

Analysis of Dialogical Argumentation via Finite State Machinesscussion, debate, persuasion and negotiation. Whilst numerous formal systems have been proposed, there is a lack of frameworks for implementing and evaluating these proposals. First-order executable logic has been proposed as a general framework for specifying and analysing dialogical argumentation.

冷淡一切

What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?a situation, different semantics have been defined in the literature (e.g. AR, IAR, ICR). Argumentation theory can also be used to draw conclusions under inconsistency. Given a set of arguments and attacks between them, one applies a particular semantics (e.g. stable, preferred, grounded) to calcula