Titlebook: Sailors, Slaves, and Immigrants; Bondage in the India Alessandro Stanziani Book 2014 Alessandro Stanziani 2014 British Empire.colonial stud

goodwill

攀登

2730-9703 radigm has narrowed our understanding of modernity. This provocative study contrasts the Atlantic conflation of freedom and the sea with the complex relationships in the Indian Ocean in the long 19th century.978-1-349-49644-0978-1-137-44844-6Series ISSN 2730-9703 Series E-ISSN 2730-9711

AMBI

Seamen in France and the French Empire: Heirs to the Galley Slave or Forerunners of the Social Secuhe quays of Marseille and in destination ports. The authorities also turned a blind eye to the galley slaves’ practice of using young boys (“passegavettes”) to help them with their business, or even to satisfy their sexual needs.

六个才偏离

Bombast

Seamen in France and the French Empire: Heirs to the Galley Slave or Forerunners of the Social Secus and of the ever insufficient and increasingly problematic separation between military conscription and the merchant navy. Marseille was the main port of registry for galley slaves; in 1630, Marseille’s arsenal fleet comprised approximately 6,000 galley slaves and Colbert organized a veritable syst

清唱剧

Sailors in the British Empire,swept through North American and European literature. Whether fighting the elements, changing ports and women, or even “redeeming” himself, the sailor was at the heart of many a tale. Well before Conrad and Melville, authors such as Fenimore Cooper (who wrote not only . , but also ., 1824) and Dicke

难取悦

Slaveries and Emancipation,sugar plantations using slave labor were developed in the eastern Mediterranean by both Venice and the Islamic powers. From 1450 increasing numbers of African slaves were shipped to Sicily, Portugal, and Spain, and others to the sugar plantations on the Portuguese-held Atlantic islands. Portuguese a

detach

From British Servants to Indentured Immigrants: The Case of Mauritius,es. Without the Masters and Servants Acts, indenture would not have been possible. This means that the labor contract was not a “fiction” but a real tool in the master’s hands. This is all the more important as masters in the colonies gradually obtained broader rights than those held by masters in G

hazard

深渊