Titlebook: Russell‘s Philosophy of Logical Analysis, 1897-1905; Jolen Galaugher Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limi

Stable-Angina

Introduction,heir decomposition into constituent concepts and relations. Russell regarded this as a breakthrough for the analysis of the propositions of mathematics. Historically, the decompositional approach to analysis has not entailed any particular conception of logic or even any special logical techniques f

separate

Proposition-Constituent Analysis and the Decomposition of Idealism,rable disagreement as to what the position entailed.. In the second half of the 19th century, a number of logical works had exhibited antagonism toward views that made the laws of thought, the propositions of logic, or ‘logical ideas’ dependent upon psychological processes.. What complicates matters

否决

Dignant

Logicism and the Analysis of Mathematical Propositions,o provide the basis for logic; logic and logicism were to provide the basis for arguments for the metaphysics’ (Hylton, 1990, p. 9).. On this account, Russell’s metaphysical commitments were adopted along with Moore’s new logic and significantly informed the logic that grew out of Russell’s break wi

使满足

,Logic and Analysis in Russell’s Definition of Number,ion of the cardinals. This view is expressed by Russell himself (IMP, p. 12). The claim to independent discovery is probably true enough, but the claim that what was discovered was Frege’s definition might require some qualification. The extent to which Russell’s conception of the cardinals should b

祖传

Toward a New Theory of Denoting,nalysis and, second, to suggest that it was nevertheless his commitment to preserving his conception of logical analysis that led him to the theory of descriptions by which he was able to dispense with his problematic denoting complexes. It was pointed out in the preceding chapter that the theory of

细颈瓶

Conclusion,ns and concepts of mathematics. However, the advantage which Russell’s decompositional conception of the analysis of propositions and the attendant theory of terms was supposed to have for the analysis of the propositions and concepts of mathematics is not always easy to ascertain. By comparison to

choleretic

2634-5994 mark theory of descriptions in 1905, draws important connections between his philosophically motivated conception of analysis and the technical apparatus he devised to facilitate analyses in mathematics978-1-349-45373-3978-1-137-30207-6Series ISSN 2634-5994 Series E-ISSN 2634-6001