Titlebook: Rule of Sympathy; Sentiment, Race, and Amit S. Rai Book 2002 Amit S. Rai 2002 argue.bibliography.critique.discourse.eighteenth century.gend

Madrigal

mpossible. This paradoxical mode of power transformed the ways in which people came to think of how best to manage, order, and govern individuals and populations in the late eighteenth century.978-1-349-38762-5978-0-312-29917-0

游行

Book 2002isely what must be bridged through identification. Yet without such differences, which were differences of power, sympathy itself would be impossible. This paradoxical mode of power transformed the ways in which people came to think of how best to manage, order, and govern individuals and populations in the late eighteenth century.

可能性

渗入

y. Although initially associated with feminized or effeminate forms of sentimental discourse (the romance, the novel, the gothic), sympathy came to function as a key technology of gender and race in new evangelical social movements, such as abolitionism and missionizing. Amit Rai argues that sympath

jet-lag

Book 2002h initially associated with feminized or effeminate forms of sentimental discourse (the romance, the novel, the gothic), sympathy came to function as a key technology of gender and race in new evangelical social movements, such as abolitionism and missionizing. Amit Rai argues that sympathy was a pa

欢乐东方

Sympathetic Governmentality,tracting and propagating new kinds of sensibilities, knowledges and relations of power seemingly exogenous to it? What is at stake here is how we conceptualize the very role of humanitarianism in the new capitalistcolonial order in England and the colonies. Given the temporal coincidence between the

连锁,连串

秘密会议

哀求

军火