Titlebook: Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights; Critical Comparative Alfredo Narváez Medécigo Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2

Animosity

书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights网络公开度




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights被引频次




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights年度引用




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights读者反馈




书目名称Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights读者反馈学科排名

宪法没有

General Conclusions,for Rule-of-Law failure. While this study does not exactly reach “beauty of diversity” conclusions like traditional comparative research usually does, the method followed to assess constitutional review arrangements in different legal systems—all of them with Rule-of-Law ambitions—allows making this critique objectively.

HEAVY

General Introduction,ers to this concept as a principle of governance that is central to its mission. Western foreign aid agencies (e.g., USAID, GIZ) and private donors invest large part of their resources on Rule-of-Law projects all over the developing world. Likewise, international financial institutions such as the W

消息灵通

地名词典

,Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does “Diffused” Mean Complete Decentralizatik in 1787 and the resilient organizations developed thereupon had such a positive impact overseas that they were still the leading global reference 200 years after the Philadelphia Convention. Institutions such as judicial review, federalism, or even presidentialism disseminated alongside American m

本能

GOAD

synchronous

General Conclusions,vement in a country must be clearly answered with a ‘yes’. Cultural differences among legal systems are somewhat overrated as a source of explanation for Rule-of-Law failure. While this study does not exactly reach “beauty of diversity” conclusions like traditional comparative research usually does,

BRIBE

Book 2016n cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the ‘law’ as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and

cornucopia

General Introduction,evelopment goal has faced only little—perhaps too little—critique. Because everyone wants it and in principle everyone can have it, virtually all current development efforts around the world include a substantial Rule-of-Law component.