Titlebook: Rudolf Hilferding; What Do We Still Hav Judith Dellheim,Frieder Otto Wolf Book 20201st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

构想

Introduction: Critically Returning to Rudolf Hilferding,man reality in 1933’ (Smaldone 1998, 8). Although this may certainly be true, in this, Rudolf Hilferding did not differ from many others, and Smaldone’s book itself ultimately says much more about Hilferding’s actual tragedy: the talented economist and social democratic politician died in the hell o

CUR

,Rethinking Hilferding’s ,d later plans by its author to rewrite the book. This chapter gives a full list of the major theoretical achievements of Hilferding’s ., correcting the conventional view of the book as an historical account of the latest phase of capitalist development. Instead, and contrary to the conventional view

离开

,From Luxemburg to Sweezy: Notes on the Intellectual Influence of Hilferding’s ,0 to 1966, the year . by Paul Sweezy and Paul Baran appeared. I will show that the ideas associated with . dominated economic thinking on the left during the second and third decades of the twentieth century. In the 1930s, the Great Depression marked a setback for the book’s prestige. However, impor

laparoscopy

,Contradictions in Hilferding’s , Money, Banking and Crisis Tendencies,een exposed to more than a century of testing. Similar to his era, today’s conjuncture combines financial power and vulnerability, and is popularly described as financialisation. Unearthing the laws of motion of the ‘finance capital’ formulation requires digging deeper than what was apparent in earl

Fibroid

Finance Capital, Financialisation and the Periodisation of Capitalist Development,ses in particular on the work of Costas Lapavitsas, showing how Lapavitsas both draws on and criticises aspects of Hilferding’s analysis. This provides the basis for a discussion of the links between differing conceptions of financialisation and corresponding analyses of the periodisation of capital

ingenue

南极

regale

影响深远

Hilferding and the Large-Scale Enterprise,pated the relegation of shareholders to the status of simple ‘money capitalists’ who had, as the studies of Berle and Means were to demonstrate, traded in their economic control against the liquidity of their holdings of securities. Drawing on subsequent analyses, it is argued that this trend contin

Hyperlipidemia