Titlebook: Rorty and Kierkegaard on Irony and Moral Commitment; Philosophical and Th Brad Frazier Book 2006 Brad Frazier 2006 autonomy.ethics.morality

公社

Kierkegaard on the Problems of Pure Irony,e as some of Rorty’s harshest critics have argued. Still it faces certain difficulties and is hampered by Rorty’s preoccupation with overcoming metaphysics and epistemology. It would be rash, however, to dismiss irony out of hand, as MacIntyre does, because of concerns with Rorty’s view of irony. Ra

眼界

Kierkegaard on Mastered Irony,s with this question: if pure irony has the significant problems that Kierkegaard says it has, why then does he not simply dispense with irony altogether, as Hegel does and as MacIntyre does in his most recent work, .? The answer is that Kierkegaard believes that irony can be mastered. When it is ma

ANT

Climacus on Irony and Moral Commitment,sitions illuminate certain features of Kierkegaard’s original position. Climacus also clarifies and elaborates the developmental role that irony has in helping persons recognize their unique moral agency, which prepares them for ethical life, in his view. Furthermore, Climacus expands the function t

下级

鸣叫

Vulnerable

http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/831800.jpg

sigmoid-colon

Book 2006This book seeks to clarify the concept of irony and its relation to moral commitment. Frazier provides a discussion of the contrasting accounts of Richard Rorty and Søren Kierkegaard. He argues that, while Rorty‘s position is much more defensible and thoughtful than his detractors acknowledge, it is surprisingly more parochial than Kierkegaard‘s.

Innovative

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601925autonomy; ethics; morality; philosophy

偏见

向外才掩饰