找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Roads Were Not Built for Cars; How Cyclists Were Th Carlton Reid Book 2015Latest edition Carlton Reid 2015 Land use planning.Transportation

[复制链接]
查看: 28977|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 19:50:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars
副标题How Cyclists Were Th
编辑Carlton Reid
视频video
概述inviting read that reveals the shared roots of motorists and cyclists, possibly.helping to bridge the current gulf between the two.A well-known author (especially in the UK) withsocial and traditional
图书封面Titlebook: Roads Were Not Built for Cars; How Cyclists Were Th Carlton Reid Book 2015Latest edition Carlton Reid 2015 Land use planning.Transportation
描述.CarltonReid reveals the pivotal—and largely unrecognized—role that bicyclists playedin the development of modern roadways. Reid introduces readers to cyclingpersonalities, such as Henry Ford, and the cycling advocacy groups thatinfluenced early road improvements, literally paving the way for themotor car. When the bicycle morphed from the vehicle of rich transportprogressives in the 1890s to the “poor man’s transport” in the 1920s, somecyclists became ardent motorists and were all too happy to forget their cyclingroots. But, Reid explains, many motor pioneers continued cycling, celebratingthe shared links between transport modes that are now seen as worlds apart. Inthis engaging and meticulously researched book, Carlton Reid encourages us allto celebrate those links once again..
出版日期Book 2015Latest edition
关键词Land use planning; Transportation; Urban planning; Bicycles; Bicycle history; landscape/regional and urba
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-688-2
isbn_ebook978-1-61091-688-2
copyrightCarlton Reid 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars网络公开度




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars被引频次




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars被引频次学科排名




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars年度引用




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars年度引用学科排名




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars读者反馈




书目名称Roads Were Not Built for Cars读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:10:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:27:03 | 显示全部楼层
Speed,19th century philosopher John Ruskin said travel was “dull in exact proportion to its rapidity.” This was a minority view, most of his contemporaries were dazzled by speed.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:40:35 | 显示全部楼层
Width,Many roads have been wide for hundreds of years. They were widened not for motor cars but to reduce congestion, to create better vistas, to prevent insurrection or to create healthier, wealthier streets.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:05:35 | 显示全部楼层
,Motoring’s Bicycling Beginnings,. – .’., ., .’.-., .-., .’., ., .’..
发表于 2025-3-22 16:05:21 | 显示全部楼层
Without Bicycles Motoring Might Not Exist,Writing in his 1988 social history ., motoring historian James J. Flink made a brief, little noticed claim:
发表于 2025-3-22 20:56:56 | 显示全部楼层
Carlton Reidinviting read that reveals the shared roots of motorists and cyclists, possibly.helping to bridge the current gulf between the two.A well-known author (especially in the UK) withsocial and traditional
发表于 2025-3-22 23:41:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:18:54 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-688-2Land use planning; Transportation; Urban planning; Bicycles; Bicycle history; landscape/regional and urba
发表于 2025-3-23 05:41:22 | 显示全部楼层
Hardtop History, mainstream adoption. It took many years of trial and error before the modern recipe was settled upon. In the meantime, many roads were capped with granite setts, dusty macadam and forgiving rubber. London’s roads, like that of many other cities, were surfaced with Australian hardwoods.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 04:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表