用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rights to Health Care; Thomas J. Bole,William B. Bondeson Book 19911st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991 Immanuel Kan

[复制链接]
楼主: 解放
发表于 2025-3-25 04:03:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:20:46 | 显示全部楼层
Justice and the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Account who favor some version of a qualified “right to equal health” or a principle of distribution of health care based primarily on need have supported their views. In addition, it will in part be a normative account of the kinds of arguments and assumptions that might best support the egalitarian posit
发表于 2025-3-25 14:24:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:11:37 | 显示全部楼层
Why the Right to Health Care is Not a Useful Concept for Policy Debatescare. Some have argued that health care is a privilege and not a right. Others, probably the more prevalent group, insist that there is a right to health care and that it has significant implications for the ways in which health care is provided and for the level of governmental funding of health ca
发表于 2025-3-25 20:13:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:50:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 06:40:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:07:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 13:37:08 | 显示全部楼层
Free Markets, Consumer Choice, and the Poor: Some Reasons for Caution would make their market freer than others. On the one extreme are the libertarians, who would allow health care to be distributed precisely as the market allocates it, with no independent evaluation of the outcome. On the other are modified market theorists, such as Alain Enthoven, who would give t
发表于 2025-3-26 19:22:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-23 02:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表