| 书目名称 | Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play | | 副标题 | Cardenio/Double Fals | | 编辑 | Deborah C. Payne | | 视频video | | | 概述 | Moves away from traditional readings of the play, which have nearly all been in the context of its contested ‘lost play‘ status, and reads it in the context of the eighteenth century.By emphasizing th | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | This collection of essays centres on .Double Falsehood., Lewis Theobald’s 1727 adaptation of the “lost” play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold .Double Falsehood. back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume’s knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon’s understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden’s command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play’s immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne’s familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of .Double Falsehood. as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama.. | | 出版日期 | Book 2016 | | 关键词 | Apocrypha; Theatre history; Lewis Theobald; Drama; Early modern | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2 | | isbn_softcover | 978-3-319-83533-4 | | isbn_ebook | 978-3-319-46514-2 | | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 18:36:19
