找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Retraction Matters; New Developments in Dan Zeman,Mihai Hîncu Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

[复制链接]
楼主: 老鼠系领带
发表于 2025-3-25 05:34:39 | 显示全部楼层
Retraction Matters978-3-031-66081-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
发表于 2025-3-25 07:42:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:54:14 | 显示全部楼层
Nevermind: On Retraction as a Speech Actformal account models the effect of a retraction on the context to restore the common ground to a prior state, computable from the conversational record. Our account also explains the status of speech acts that follow the target of retraction. Retractions are cognitively costly on our account, but, we argue, this is the right result.
发表于 2025-3-25 19:40:06 | 显示全部楼层
0166-6991 tures new contributions from internationally renowned schola.This book offers the first sustained investigation of the phenomenon of retraction - the “taking back” of the conventional or deontic effects of a previous speech act - bringing together issues and solutions from the semantics of perspecti
发表于 2025-3-25 21:48:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:49:46 | 显示全部楼层
Taste Predicates and Retraction Data: An Improved Frameworkstics. These debates have yielded many subtle and inventive analyses of PPT. There is, however, a crucial methodological question about PPT that remains underexplored: what sorts of . should be used in evaluating an account of PPT? In line with a fairly large body of recent work, we point out that s
发表于 2025-3-26 04:40:17 | 显示全部楼层
Falsity and Retraction: New Experimental Data on Epistemic Modalstences and uses this evidence as part of a broader argument against assessment relativism. It follows other papers that reach similar conclusions, such as that of Knobe and Yalcin (Semant Pragmat 7:1–21, 2014). Its results were achieved simultaneously and independently of the more recent work of Kne
发表于 2025-3-26 09:46:18 | 显示全部楼层
Relativism and Retraction: The Case Is Not Yet Losta variety of natural language expressions (predicates of taste, epistemic modals, moral and aesthetic claims etc.) in support of their view. The main consideration offered is that relativism can, while rival views cannot, account for this phenomenon. For some of those leading the charge, retraction
发表于 2025-3-26 13:41:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:57:57 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-4 22:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表