找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy; Yafeng Shan Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

[复制链接]
楼主: 讽刺文章
发表于 2025-3-23 09:43:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 17:25:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:27:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:50:37 | 显示全部楼层
Thomas Kuhn, Modern Mathematics and the Dynamics of Reasonersity Press, Oxford, 1992) which took as their central question the usefulness for the philosophy of mathematics of Kuhn’s constructions in the philosophy of science. Important work was done to see whether the concepts of ‘revolution’ and ‘paradigm’ made sense there. However, a feature of the colle
发表于 2025-3-24 04:02:21 | 显示全部楼层
Kuhn, Progress, and Knowing-How: An Epistemological-Functional Account of Scientific Progressogress comes down to improved problem-solving. It is important to realize that Kuhn talks about the progress of scientific .. This raises the question of in what sense exactly problem-solving is knowledge. This chapter then has two main goals. The first is to explain Kuhn’s account of problem-solvin
发表于 2025-3-24 08:37:33 | 显示全部楼层
Worlds, Algorithms, and Niches: The Feedback-Loop Idea in Kuhn’s Philosophyuniversal algorithm thesis, and the niche-construction analogy. We will do that by resorting to a hitherto neglected notion employed by Kuhn: the idea of a feedback loop. We will show that this notion captures an important structural aspect of the epistemic dynamics at work in each of the three thes
发表于 2025-3-24 14:05:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 18:21:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:42:34 | 显示全部楼层
Kuhn and Philosophyt it was ignored or snubbed and passed over in philosophical anthologies or textbooks. Secondly, I discuss how ., nevertheless, impacted philosophical development. Finally, I offer an explanation of Kuhn’s marginalization in analytic philosophy that goes beyond the prevalent view which says that he
发表于 2025-3-24 23:13:14 | 显示全部楼层
Reappraising Kind Conceptsoncepts would be acquired through ostension and organized into hierarchical structures, also known as “taxonomies”. However, in one of his last papers, Kuhn introduced a second type of kind concept, one that is established through law-like generalisations, the singletons. In this chapter, I argue th
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-14 12:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表