找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Restoring the Classic in Sociology; Traditions, Texts an Alan R. How Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Hermene

[复制链接]
楼主: T-Lymphocyte
发表于 2025-3-23 12:18:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 15:00:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:41:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:51:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:37:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 06:53:58 | 显示全部楼层
The Sense of an Ending now altogether more contentious. For its advocates it is something worth cherishing because the virtues of its classics are self-evident. Writing of sociology’s classics, Gianfranco Poggi (1996: 39–40) declared that ‘their unique intellectual texture [and] the magnitude of their scholarly achieveme
发表于 2025-3-24 13:55:33 | 显示全部楼层
In Pursuit of Identity: Fragmentation, Conflict and Crisisscipline. An important related theme throughout this section is the way sociology tends to diminish the significance of the past, underestimate the importance of tradition, and thereby skew the way it conceives its classics. The classic, I shall argue, links the past and the present; it discloses ho
发表于 2025-3-24 17:09:31 | 显示全部楼层
Contested Identity: Sociology in Postmodern Timesl power of self-determination. The work of Beck and Giddens was regarded as more moderate in tone but still shared the assumption that tradition was a restriction on agency, something negative from which the individual would naturally seek to escape.
发表于 2025-3-24 22:05:15 | 显示全部楼层
The Hermeneutic Approachction to it. It is the weakness of these concepts that they rarely acknowledge the gap between what they describe and the relation they have to what preceded them. They disregard the creativity of tradition, habit, custom, and so forth, ignoring the idea that the past and the present interpenetrate
发表于 2025-3-25 00:35:52 | 显示全部楼层
Canons and Their Discontentss conceal the collusion classic authors have with the repressive hierarchies of their time. In ‘Why is Classical Theory Classical?’, R.W. Connell (1997: 1511–1157) uses the principles of social constructionism to present a particularly powerful challenge to the validity of the sociological canon, ar
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-20 01:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表