找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Restoration Historians and the English Civil War; Royce MacGillivray Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Civil War.Eng

[复制链接]
查看: 14802|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 17:13:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War
编辑Royce MacGillivray
视频video
丛书名称International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
图书封面Titlebook: Restoration Historians and the English Civil War;  Royce MacGillivray Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Civil War.Eng
描述This is a study of the histories of the English Civil War or some aspects of it written in England or by Englishmen and Englishwomen or publish­ ed in England up to 1702, the year of the publication of the first volume of Clarendon‘s History of the Rebellion. By the terms of this definition, Clarendon is himself, of course, one of the historians studied. Clarendon‘s History is so formidable an achievement that all historians writing about the war before its publication have an air of prematureness. Nevertheless, as I hope the following pages will show, they produced a body of writing which may still be read with interest and profit and which anticipated many of the ideas and attitudes of Clarendon‘s History. I will even go so far as to say that many readers who have only a limited interest or no in­ terest in the Civil War are likely to find many of these historians interest­ ing, should their works come to their attention, for their treatment of the problems of man in society, for their psychological acuteness, and for their style. But while I intend to show their merits, my main concern will be to show how the Civil War appeared to historians, including Clarendon, who wrote withi
出版日期Book 1974
关键词Civil War; English; John Locke; Thomas Hobbes; body; corpus; experience; history; history of literature; rest
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1625-4
isbn_softcover978-94-010-1627-8
isbn_ebook978-94-010-1625-4Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
issn_series 0066-6610
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War网络公开度




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War被引频次




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War被引频次学科排名




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War年度引用




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War年度引用学科排名




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War读者反馈




书目名称Restoration Historians and the English Civil War读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:14:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:55:39 | 显示全部楼层
978-94-010-1627-8Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974
发表于 2025-3-22 04:48:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:34:59 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,Here it may be worthwhile to make some generalizations about how the historians examined in this study approached the historical problem of the Civil War.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:37:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:28:56 | 显示全部楼层
Parliamentarian and Whig Historians from the Restoration to 1702,hich their Parliamentarianism led them. We have seen that in the same period Rushworth expresses his Parliamentarian views only weakly, Whitelocke is close to being a repentant Parliamentarian, and Baxter condemns much of the outcome of the Parliamentarian cause.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:25:43 | 显示全部楼层
Whitelocke,y, and usefulness of which… are so universally allowed.” . But J. L. Sanford, who was one of the founders or revivers of accurate knowledge of the Civil War in the nineteenth century, spoke of the . “thorough untrustworthiness.”.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:26:54 | 显示全部楼层
Royalist Historians from the Restoration to 1702,essor had not existed. Presumably these statements would not have been true if more of the histories had been of high quality; most of them were the ancestors of modern textbooks and modern popular histories, not of Gardiner’s scholarly and authoritative volumes.
发表于 2025-3-23 06:21:25 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-31 23:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表