找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Representational Content and the Objects of Thought; Nicholas Rimell Book 2021 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021 mental content.con

[复制链接]
查看: 51036|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought
编辑Nicholas Rimell
视频video
概述Ties together a variety of important questions in metaphysics, philosophy of mind , and philosophy of language.Offers an exposition of leading versions of content internalism, including David Chalmers
图书封面Titlebook: Representational Content and the Objects of Thought;  Nicholas Rimell Book 2021 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021 mental content.con
描述.This book defends a novel view of mental representation—of how, as thinkers, we represent the world as being. The book serves as a response to two problems in the philosophy of mind. One is the problem of first-personal, or egocentric, belief: how can we have truly first personal beliefs—beliefs in which we think about ourselves as ourselves—given that beliefs are supposed to be attitudes towards propositions and that propositions are supposed to have their truth values independent of a perspective? .The other problem is  how we can think about nonexistents (e.g., Santa Claus) given the widespread view that thought essentially involves a relation between a thinker and whatever is being thought about. The standard responses to this puzzle are either to deny that thought is essentially relational or to insist that it is possible to stand in relations to nonexistents. This book offers an error theory to the problem...The responses from this book arise from thesame commitment: a commitment to treating talk of propositions—as the things towards which our beliefs are attitudes—as talk of entities that actually exist and that play a constitutive and explanatory role in the activity of th
出版日期Book 2021
关键词mental content; content internalism; content externalism; objects of thought; propositions; first-persona
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3517-5
isbn_softcover978-981-16-3519-9
isbn_ebook978-981-16-3517-5
copyrightShanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought网络公开度




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引频次




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引频次学科排名




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用学科排名




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought读者反馈




书目名称Representational Content and the Objects of Thought读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:12:41 | 显示全部楼层
Narrow Representational Content,h this debate from subtly different debates. I then lay out the main argument for externalism. The argument’s crucial premise is . (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the same representational content while differing in truth value. If CFT is true, internalism is false and externalism is true
发表于 2025-3-22 04:24:27 | 显示全部楼层
Narrow Content and Propositions,inherit the contents of—propositions. Second, necessarily, propositions have truth values, and they have these truth values absolutely. Thus, there are no . propositions. It is commonly recognized that these two tenets jointly entail Content Fixes Truth (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the
发表于 2025-3-22 04:46:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:55:30 | 显示全部楼层
Why We Cannot Think about Nonexistents,itutively involves a thinker’s standing in a relation to an object of thought, then it is impossible to think about nonexistents. I present an argument that is clearly valid. I then argue that, to make sense of the validity of this argument, we must accept that thinking constitutively involves a rel
发表于 2025-3-22 13:16:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:27:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:07:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:30:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:38:27 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 21:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表