Titlebook: Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s; Martin D. Yaffe,Richard S. Ruderman Book 2014 Martin D. Yaffe and Richard S. Ruderman 2014 Carl S

Addendum

书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s网络公开度




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s被引频次




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s年度引用




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s读者反馈




书目名称Reorientation: Leo Strauss in the 1930s读者反馈学科排名

apropos

,Strauss and Schleiermacher on How to Read Plato: An Introduction to “Exoteric Teaching”,studies, written and published mainly during the 1940s, in which Strauss applied his thesis of exoteric writing: While the main subjects of these articles are writers from the Jewish and Islamic Middle Ages, “Exoteric Teaching” takes a different route by presenting the issue exclusively from what may loosely be called a Western perspective..

胶状

generic

极大痛苦

How Strauss Became Strauss,h by history or to have fallen into oblivion, thus to have become a thing of the past in every sense. That political philosophy has been recognized to have a present and ultimately a future is the achievement of Leo Strauss. It is especially this achievement that marks his place in the history of ph

convulsion

tympanometry

彻底明白

特别容易碎

Strauss on the Religious and Intellectual Situation of the Present,itt and Martin D. Yaffe.. Addressed to a Jewish audience, the talks were given in the most politically unsettled years for Germany, and the richest, intellectually, for German Jews. Among the topics they address is “[t]he Jewish problem, whose urgency in the age of National Socialism perhaps does no

botany

,Leo Strauss on the Origins of Hobbes’s Natural Science and Its Relation to the Challenge of Divine that Strauss identifies as the crucial one in his intellectual development, when he underwent what he calls, in the 1965 preface to ., his “change of orientation.” He moved at this time from the premise that a return to premodern philosophy was impossible to the recognition that such a return is pos