找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Religion on Our Campuses; A Professor’s Guide Mark U. Edwards Book 2006 Mark U. Edwards, Jr. 2006 religion.Seminar.teaching.university.str

[复制链接]
楼主: credit
发表于 2025-3-23 12:31:32 | 显示全部楼层
Encountersavior, most of us have been on the receiving end of an attempt at proselytization. And while we may understand why they are doing what they are doing, and even applaud their commitment and bravery in making the approach, we are commonly at least a bit uncomfortable and wish they would simply leave u
发表于 2025-3-23 16:22:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:48:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:38:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:31:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:50:17 | 显示全部楼层
Inclinationsisposed to others, .. We also consider how, as conscientious scholars, we strive to be aware of these influences and to compensate when they may mislead us. As with the last chapter, I propose we approach these questions through narrative, making sense of our interpretive or explanatory choices thro
发表于 2025-3-24 10:54:16 | 显示全部楼层
Community Warrant, and power. Even the most militantly individualistic and independent scholars. must normally go through an extensive professional formation within a discipline, including a probationary period as an assistant professor, followed by further demonstration of professional competence leading eventually
发表于 2025-3-24 17:00:44 | 显示全部楼层
Academic Freedomacademic freedom when individuals or institutions outside the faculty member’s field attempt to constrain or dictate what individual faculty members research, publish, teach, or say extramurally. This is the sense of academic freedom most closely associated with the American Association of Universit
发表于 2025-3-24 21:09:17 | 显示全部楼层
Reticenceor interpretation over another, even as the scholars in question commonly . their explanation or interpretation without recourse to their religious or spiritual beliefs. Certain questions naturally arise: Are there good reasons to be reticent about such convictions when framing a scholarly argument?
发表于 2025-3-25 02:58:08 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 15:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表