Titlebook: Relativism Refuted; A Critique of Contem Harvey Siegel Book 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1987 epistemology.philosophy of

Agitated

书目名称Relativism Refuted影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Relativism Refuted影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Relativism Refuted网络公开度




书目名称Relativism Refuted网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Relativism Refuted被引频次




书目名称Relativism Refuted被引频次学科排名




书目名称Relativism Refuted年度引用




书目名称Relativism Refuted年度引用学科排名




书目名称Relativism Refuted读者反馈




书目名称Relativism Refuted读者反馈学科排名

口诀法

anticipate

The Kuhniansexamine two of these defenses/extensions of the Kuhnian position. The first centers on the objectivity of science, in which Jack W. Meiland seeks to interpret Kuhn as a proponent of objectivity, contrary to the standard critical interpretation of Kuhn as discussed in Chapter 3. The second is a reint

打折

变形词

剧毒

债务

吹气

The Kuhniansdiscussion also concerns itself, in part, with relativism.) In the case of each of these authors I will try to show that their discussions fail to support a Kuhnian conception of science in general, or of relativism in particular. I begin with Meiland.

GAVEL

Kuhn and Relativism: Is He or Isn’t He? of charge and counter-charge between Kuhn and his critics, and to assess the power of the broad Kuhnian picture of science, especially regarding relativism, the objectivity of scientific knowledge, and the rationality of scientific methodology. We begin with an exposition of Kuhn’s book.

值得