找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reinventing Philosophy of Religion; An Opinionated Intro Graham Oppy Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limit

[复制链接]
楼主: Coarse
发表于 2025-3-23 10:18:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:09:42 | 显示全部楼层
Introductory RemarksWe begin with characterizations of philosophy, philosophy of religion, and religion. Having noted the weaknesses of standard accounts of religion, we settle on a modification of the account provided in Atran and Norenzayan (2004). We conclude with some observations about worldviews, atheism, and competing conceptions of philosophy.
发表于 2025-3-23 21:18:01 | 显示全部楼层
Disagreement, Opinion and Expertisefacts of religious disagreement — irreligion, pluralism, exclusivism — we consider some more unsettling questions that are raised to us by our disagreement with those who are at least as smart, well-informed, reflective and attentive as we are when it comes to questions about religion. We argue that
发表于 2025-3-23 23:20:46 | 显示全部楼层
Belief, Faith and Evidence in one’s religious believing if one appropriately apportions one’s beliefs according to the evidence that one has. Others suppose that reasonable religious belief can be a matter of faith, that is of belief in the absence of sufficient evidence to justify the belief in question. Yet others believe
发表于 2025-3-24 05:11:00 | 显示全部楼层
Debate, Reason and Argumenttanding dogma, we argue that alleged proofs of the characteristic claims of worldviews — including religious worldviews — are almost always unsuccessful (and, when they are successful, they typically achieve much less than proponents of the alleged proofs might have hoped for).
发表于 2025-3-24 07:36:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:36:58 | 显示全部楼层
Mind, Body and Spirit consider ways in which this naturalistic account might be challenged by proponents of religious worldviews, and the significance of these challenges for other metaphysical and ethical issues, including cosmic justice and life after death.
发表于 2025-3-24 17:51:42 | 显示全部楼层
Cause, Freedom and Responsibilityand fate that are prompted by reflections upon causality, chance and determinism. Finally, we consider arguments against both compatibilism and incompatibilism. We conclude that there is considerable overlap between the range of naturalist opinion and the range of religious opinion on these matters.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:25:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 01:49:56 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 16:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表