找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reconstruction in Literary Studies; An Informalist Appro Bryan Vescio Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014

[复制链接]
查看: 36375|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 17:49:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies
副标题An Informalist Appro
编辑Bryan Vescio
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Reconstruction in Literary Studies; An Informalist Appro Bryan Vescio Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
描述Pointing the way toward a revitalized future for the study of literature, Reconstruction in Literary Studies draws on philosophical pragmatism to justify the academic study of literature. In turn, Vescio connects the changing field to its social function as an institution.
出版日期Book 2014
关键词aesthetics; culture; literary studies; transcendental philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428837
isbn_softcover978-1-349-49161-2
isbn_ebook978-1-137-42883-7
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies网络公开度




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies被引频次




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies年度引用




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies读者反馈




书目名称Reconstruction in Literary Studies读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:32:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:06:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:27:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:04:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:04:08 | 显示全部楼层
The Ministry of Disturbanceport with a post-Darwinian aesthetic and a Deweyan conception of democracy. But a few questions remain to be answered. Specifically, a full-fledged theory of literature and literary criticism ought to be able to describe what is particularly “literary” about the texts and methods that are employed i
发表于 2025-3-22 18:11:04 | 显示全部楼层
The Legacy of Deconstructionformalist conception of the institution of literary studies. But in spite of the fact that almost all literary scholars today instinctively disavow formalism, most probably would not describe their work as contributions to the “Ministry of Disturbance” as I have described it. That is because the his
发表于 2025-3-23 01:14:41 | 显示全部楼层
The Very Idea of Literatureal contexts of race, class, gender, and sexuality that New Critical formalism sought to exclude. What enabled critical approaches employing such contexts to dominate the profession as they now do was the specific version of antiformalism championed by deconstruction and embodied in Derrida’s asserti
发表于 2025-3-23 02:20:30 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion good literature, and what is literature good for? By redefining “aesthetic value,” “literature,” and “literary criticism” in terms of the institutions that sustain them, the first part of my book primarily attempted to answer the first question. The second part then explained why other contemporary
发表于 2025-3-23 08:26:26 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/824246.jpg
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 23:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表