找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[复制链接]
查看: 47361|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 17:50:51 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity
副标题Beyond Denial
编辑Barbara Redman
视频video
概述Exposes blind spots in scientific self-regulation.Identifies policies and practices that can support research integrity.Discusses ethics in emerging technological fields in medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Reconstructing Research Integrity; Beyond Denial Barbara Redman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive
描述.This book exposes significant threats to research integrity and identifies policies and practices that can reverse these trends. It is focused on human research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and inaccessible scientific record, conflicts of interest, differing notions of accountability, virtually no evidence base to direct research integrity policy, and a growing sense of alienation, moral injury and even revolt among scientists. .Reconstructing Research Integrity. aims to capture ways of vigorously moving toward scientific and ethical rigor, including self-correction and emerging or already-successful initiatives..The book begins with analysis of the full system of institutions, policies, and practices involved in production, dissemination, and application of research, including an examination of the blind spots in research ethics ideology, policy, and practice. The book then identifies policies and practices that can reverse harmfu
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Research Ethics; Medical Ethics; Responsible Conduct of Research; Research integrity; Ethics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27111-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-27113-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-27111-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity网络公开度




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity被引频次




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity读者反馈




书目名称Reconstructing Research Integrity读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:15:45 | 显示全部楼层
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity, training, established during a time of resistance by universities of what they believed was incursion into their affairs, has not developed into a competence-based model necessary for research integrity.
发表于 2025-3-22 02:47:54 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2023an research and US policy. Recent assessments have shown inadequacies in institutions, policies, and practices that seriously compromise ethics. The presumed self-regulatory nature of the scientific endeavor has been exposed to have allowed unabated areas of poor-quality science, an incomplete and i
发表于 2025-3-22 05:13:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:11:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:27:35 | 显示全部楼层
Blind Spots in Research Integrity Policy: How to Identify and Resolve Them, guiding/regulating a field must regularly be examined through alternate lenses to find currently out-of-favor views that might suggest a solution to a problem. An example is the current conceptualization of research misconduct including its depiction in regulation. Current policy requires a good fa
发表于 2025-3-22 18:35:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:14:16 | 显示全部楼层
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Instruction Supporting Research Integrity,ning emanating from individuals, scientific societies, and institutions employing scientists. Such a system does not exist. Mentorship for young researchers is apparently of uneven quality and largely not regulated by universities. The current model of socialization by osmosis might better be replac
发表于 2025-3-23 05:25:40 | 显示全部楼层
,Emerging, Evolving Self-Regulation by the Scientific Community,ifted in the direction of democratization, requiring focus on social responsibility and some regulatory oversight. The Institutional Corruption framework, broadly applied across societal activities, requires that science must be true to its core purpose and not diverted from it by institutional prac
发表于 2025-3-23 06:31:53 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-19 02:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表