找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity; From Old Liberties t Ulrike Müßig Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Edit

[复制链接]
查看: 24466|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 16:04:53 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity
副标题From Old Liberties t
编辑Ulrike Müßig
视频video
概述Identifies constitutional normativity in European constitutions.Breaks new ground in approaches to constitutional history.Sheds new light on historical discourses concerning fundamental laws, constitu
丛书名称Studies in the History of Law and Justice
图书封面Titlebook: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity; From Old Liberties t Ulrike Müßig Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Edit
描述.This second volume of ReConFort, published open access, addresses the decisive role of constitutional normativity, and focuses on discourses concerning the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of power, judiciary as constituted power)..In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, constitutional normativity began to complete the legal fixation of the entire political order. This juridification in one constitutional text resulted in a conceptual differentiation from ordinary law, which extends to alterability and justiciability. The early expressions of this ‘new order of the ages’ suggest an unprecedented and irremediable break with European legal tradition, be it with British colonial governance or the French ancien régime. In fact, while the shift to constitutions as a hierarchically ‘higher’ form of positive law was a revolutionary change, it also drew upon old liberties. The American constitutional discourse, which was itself heavily
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018
关键词Precedence of Constitution; Normativity and Constitution; Constitutional History of Europe; Constitutio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73037-0
isbn_softcover978-3-030-10304-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-73037-0Series ISSN 2198-9842 Series E-ISSN 2198-9850
issn_series 2198-9842
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity网络公开度




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引频次




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity读者反馈




书目名称Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:06:56 | 显示全部楼层
The Development of Constitutional Precedence and the Constitutionalization of Individual Rights,lishmen. I also show how notably in the case of the notorious “Septennial Act” of 1716, criticism that Parliament violated the “constitution” was expressed, and how about three decades later in the writings of Bolingbroke the word “unconstitutional” was born, gaining wide currency in the North Ameri
发表于 2025-3-22 01:44:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:06:06 | 显示全部楼层
The Codification of the Polish Substantial Criminal Law in the Sejm Debates 1818,or parts..In the first, introductory part the origins of the 1815 Constitution are discussed. This part of the article presents the current state of the art of the polish legal history concerning the genesis of this highest normative act of the 1815–1830 Polish Kingdom. Following the explanations pr
发表于 2025-3-22 09:35:48 | 显示全部楼层
Constitutional Precedence and the Genesis of the Belgian Constitution of 1831,bedded in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. It does so by combining a historical-genealogical approach with a legal one. The chapter begins with a discussion of the genesis of the Belgian Constitution in relation to the Fundamental Law of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. It shows how the Belgi
发表于 2025-3-22 13:57:25 | 显示全部楼层
Inaugurating a Dutch Napoleon? Conservative Criticism of the 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdoeaties. Following articles 57 and 58, international agreements could be concluded and ratified by the monarch, save for peacetime cessions of territory. The constitutional committee’s debates treat the matter rather hastily. William I (1772–1843)’s role at the establishment of the Kingdom of the Uni
发表于 2025-3-22 19:26:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:27:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:24:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:14:50 | 显示全部楼层
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ng the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of po
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-17 04:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表