找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy; The Case of Alternat Katerina Psarikidou Book 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nat

[复制链接]
查看: 52241|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 17:26:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy
副标题The Case of Alternat
编辑Katerina Psarikidou
视频video
概述The first sociological study that aims to reclaim the concept of the ‘knowledge economy’.Based on extensive fieldwork with urban and rural agro-food initiatives in the UK.Provides critical sociologica
图书封面Titlebook: Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy; The Case of Alternat Katerina Psarikidou Book 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nat
描述.This book offers a critical analysis of the diverse knowledge and knowledge production  processes  through  which ‘alternative  agro-food networks’  can constitute a more plural ‘knowledge economy’. It provides critical sociological and political economic insights that help problematise dominant capitalocentric and technocentric framings of the ‘knowledge (bio)economy’. It will appeal to researchers, practitioners and policy-makers  with  an  interest  in  supporting inclusive research, policy and innovation agendas for sustainability..
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Alternative Agro-Food Networks; Knowledge Bio-Economy; Political Economy; Knowledge; Labour; Innovation; A
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6843-2
isbn_softcover978-981-16-6845-6
isbn_ebook978-981-16-6843-2
copyrightThe Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy网络公开度




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy被引频次




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy年度引用




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy读者反馈




书目名称Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:57:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:21:26 | 显示全部楼层
Katerina Psarikidouecently gained more recognition. Experimental Philosophy of Language (EPL) is one of the research topics that has drawn a great deal of attention lately. This chapter performs a bibliometric analysis of the EPL field in order to show the research trends, collaboration networks and topics structure t
发表于 2025-3-22 05:18:59 | 显示全部楼层
Katerina Psarikidouvoluntarily’ has been taken to cast doubt on the methods of ordinary language philosophy. As Benson Mates puts the worry, ‘if agreement about usage cannot be reached within so restricted a sample as the class of Oxford Professors of Philosophy, what are the prospects when the sample is enlarged?’ (M
发表于 2025-3-22 11:02:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:14:59 | 显示全部楼层
Katerina Psarikidouecently gained more recognition. Experimental Philosophy of Language (EPL) is one of the research topics that has drawn a great deal of attention lately. This chapter performs a bibliometric analysis of the EPL field in order to show the research trends, collaboration networks and topics structure t
发表于 2025-3-22 20:20:19 | 显示全部楼层
Katerina Psarikidouecently gained more recognition. Experimental Philosophy of Language (EPL) is one of the research topics that has drawn a great deal of attention lately. This chapter performs a bibliometric analysis of the EPL field in order to show the research trends, collaboration networks and topics structure t
发表于 2025-3-23 01:07:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:30:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:35:43 | 显示全部楼层
Katerina Psarikidou algorithm to uncover connections between different types of use. In applying these methods, we show where and to what extent Ryle’s and Austin’s accounts of the use of the target terms are accurate as well as where they miss important aspects of ordinary use, and we demonstrate the usefulness of th
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-11 09:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表