Titlebook: Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations; J. N. Mohanty Book 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977 Edmund Husserl.

甜瓜

Husserl on Signification and Object,edure results in a curious and interesting account of the relation between the signification (.) of an expression and its object or referent (.). My purpose is to examine the aspects of this account which help determine where Husserl stands with respect to the so-called referential theory of meaning

BUMP

DEMUR

,Outlines of a Theory of “Essentially Occasional Expressions”,e expressions such as “in front,” “behind,” “near,” “far,” etc. These terms imply a certain relativity to a referential system in the sense that an object to which one of these terms may be applied under certain circumstances, i.e. with respect to one orientation of the referential system, may no lo

prolate

,Husserl’s Conception of a Purely Logical Grammar,enerable speculation of both linguists and philosophers. This assumption is not fashionable any more, and the old arguments adduced for it could not withstand the onslaught on the empirical evidence provided by the study of “exotic” languages. Nevertheless, in a certain sense, to be more closely det

chalice

,Husserl’s Conception of “The Grammatical” and Contemporary Linguistics, as a branch or an application of formal logic. These researches have never progressed very far, not even during the period when grammarians were themselves primarily logicians. In the modern period, since scientific linguistics has vindicated its own independence of logic and philosophy, philosophi

negotiable

Endoscope

paleolithic

芭蕾舞女演员

SPASM