Titlebook: Readings in Formal Epistemology; Sourcebook Horacio Arló-Costa,Vincent F. Hendricks,Johan van Textbook 2016 Springer International Publish

温室

Discussion: A Mistake in Dynamic Coherence Arguments? strengthened "sequentialized" notion of dynamic coherence is explored here. It so happens that even on the strengthened standards for a Dutch book, the classic dynamic coherence argument for conditioning still goes through.

compel

缓和

AROMA

因无茶而冷淡

Probable Knowledgege to age with the scope of what we take ourselves to know; and philosophers who are impressed with this flux sometimes set themselves the problem of explaining how we can get along, knowing as little as we do. For knowledge is sure, and there seems to be little we can be sure of outside logic and m

解冻

Explicate

galley

Why I am not a Bayesianes not purport to be, of a deductive kind. A confirmation theory should serve as a critical and explanatory instrument quite as much as do theories of deductive inference. Any successful confirmation theory should, for example, reveal the structure and fallacies, if any, in Newton’s argument for uni