Titlebook: Reading Historical Fiction; The Revenant and Rem Kate Mitchell,Nicola Parsons Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish

宣告无效

书目名称Reading Historical Fiction影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction网络公开度




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction被引频次




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction年度引用




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction读者反馈




书目名称Reading Historical Fiction读者反馈学科排名

补助

,‘All Histories Are Against You?’: Family History, Domestic History and the Feminine Past in , and ,s a passionate refusal of masculinist history. As Stuart Curran has astutely observed, Anne’s ‘sharp observation […] has often been taken as a characteristically oblique expression’ of Austen’s ‘feminism as well as a defense of her singular craft’ (1993, 177).

THROB

意外的成功

recession

GUILT

ion from the eighteenth century to today. In shifting focus to the agency of the reader and taking a long historical view, the collection brings a new perspective to the field of historical representation.978-1-349-34453-6978-1-137-29154-7

增强

执

散布

Temporal Systems in Representations of the Past: Distance, Freedom and Irony in Historical Fiction,. A concept sometimes invoked is the idea of ‘distance’ — a spatial metaphor that names the conceptual separation between past and present assumed to be a precondition of historical understanding. Disciplinary history, the argument goes, depends on respecting the distance between the current-day res

废除

,‘All Histories Are Against You?’: Family History, Domestic History and the Feminine Past in , and , many the key to understanding Jane Austen’s particular view of history. Most critics contend that Anne Elliot is voicing the view of the mature Austen, an author at the height of her powers, well placed to defend feminine modes of narration. Reading Anne Elliot’s statements as Austen’s views usuall