找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Reading George Grant in the 21st Century; Tyler Chamberlain Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

[复制链接]
查看: 49129|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 17:15:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century
编辑Tyler Chamberlain
视频video
概述Analyzes George Grant’s legacy as Canada’s foremost public philosophy.Considers Grant’s philosophy in the context of contemporary debates, such as nationalism and religion.Underlines the import of Gra
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism
图书封面Titlebook: Reading George Grant in the 21st Century;  Tyler Chamberlain Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic
描述.George Grant (1918-1988) was one of Canada’s foremost public philosophers. Though his thought arose out of reflection on the history of political philosophy, pressing political concerns were never far from view. He was particularly adept at locating the causes of political developments in philosophical movements that were centuries in the making. This book reassesses his ideas in light of philosophical and political developments of recent decades, including the resurgence of nationalism, criticisms of globalization and technocracy, and the ideological realignments having a particularly noticeable effect on right-wing politics. The contemporary reader of Grant is thus able to reflect on his broader criticisms of modernity from within a slightly different historical articulation of modernity. Though George Grant died in 1988, the philosophical themes in his work remain relevant into the 21.st. century...
出版日期Book 2023
关键词George Grant; Canadian politics; philosophers; nationalism; politicians; civilization; globalization; relig
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44889-8
isbn_softcover978-3-031-44891-1
isbn_ebook978-3-031-44889-8Series ISSN 2662-6470 Series E-ISSN 2662-6489
issn_series 2662-6470
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license Springer Nature Switzerland
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century网络公开度




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century被引频次




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century被引频次学科排名




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century年度引用




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century年度引用学科排名




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century读者反馈




书目名称Reading George Grant in the 21st Century读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:06:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:34:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:27:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:32:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:15:06 | 显示全部楼层
Technology as Empire: George Grant and Russell Kirk on American Conservatismt never engaged with the seminal American conservative Russell Kirk, a self-styled “Bohemian Tory.” Kirk championed the classical and Christian inheritance, critiqued foreign adventurism, and (like Grant) resigned in protest from a technological multiversity in 1959. Might a dialogue with Kirk have
发表于 2025-3-22 19:49:07 | 显示全部楼层
George Grant and Roger Scruton: Scrutinizing Scruton and the New Leftks a different trail than Scruton. I will, in this essay, reflect on how Scruton and Grant interpret the New Left and Ecology differently and the difference it makes, such a difference clarifying essential differences between Scruton’s Conservatism (first-generation liberal of the Lockian-Burkean-Sm
发表于 2025-3-22 21:54:51 | 显示全部楼层
Only (a) God Can Save Us: Grant and Heidegger’s Competing Responses to Technological Nihilismigures of the European, Eurasian, and American New Right, including Aleksandr Dugin and Alain de Benoist. It argues that Grant is a timely interlocutor because while he accepts key features of Heidegger’s critique of modernity, he nevertheless attempts to find a path forward that avoids the politica
发表于 2025-3-23 04:38:22 | 显示全部楼层
What Are We Lamenting? George Grant’s High Toryism as a Form of Canadian Nationalism liberalism, a critique that implies the falsity of a fashionable objection to Grant. This objection, represented by Michael Ignatieff, suggests that Grant’s attachment to British Toryism is simply an outdated idiosyncrasy unworthy of attention, and certainly not central to the continued significanc
发表于 2025-3-23 08:02:35 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 22:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表