找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rationality: The Critical View; Joseph Agassi (Professor of Philosophy),Ian Charle Book 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987 1

[复制链接]
楼主: OAK
发表于 2025-3-30 10:30:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 16:09:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 17:42:51 | 显示全部楼层
Seven Desiderata for Rationalityowever, for better or for worse they have not reached a consensus. It is for the better, because lack of consensus may indicate that the problem is still open. And for the worse, because dissensus may indicate confusion, which is often a result of superficiality.
发表于 2025-3-30 21:18:37 | 显示全部楼层
Arguments for Skepticisments seem to show that such statements are doubtful. In this sense skeptical arguments seem to imply that we are not more rational than a lunatic or a fool. This is — in a nutshell — “the problem of skepticism.”
发表于 2025-3-31 01:10:49 | 显示全部楼层
Science and the Search for Truththodical rationalism and a critical realism. Each of these components plays a role in the solution of the problems we are concerned with. I should also like to emphasize that this philosophical conception has consequences that are of importance for problems of all kinds, not merely for problems pertaining to knowledge.
发表于 2025-3-31 08:53:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 12:33:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 14:42:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 17:36:43 | 显示全部楼层
Methodological Individualism and Institutional IndividualismMy aim in the present essay is to argue that individualism need not be psychologistic, and to defend institutionalistic individualism, which I consider to be Popper’s great contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences.
发表于 2025-4-1 01:03:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-21 02:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表