Titlebook: Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848; Essays in Honour of Michael T. Davis Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

Sediment

书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848网络公开度




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848被引频次




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848被引频次学科排名




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848年度引用




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848年度引用学科排名




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848读者反馈




书目名称Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848读者反馈学科排名

钢笔记下惩罚

,‘Rural War’ and the Missing Revolution in Early Nineteenth-century England, across the ideological divides of Regency and Victorian historiography. The question has even figured prominently in the work of historians of conservative methodologies, including some who probably would not defend counter-factual or ‘virtual’ history in other contexts..

罐里有戒指

and re-examines the threats and ideas of revolution and the byzantine networks and character of British radical culture in the turbulent and intriguing years between 1775 and 1848.978-1-349-41008-8978-0-230-50938-2

争吵加

narcotic

,‘The Friends of America’: British Sympathy with the American Revolution,and fundamentally in their understanding of the liberties of British subjects and their interpretation of the British constitution. What can reasonably be regarded as a civil war within the British Atlantic empire in the later eighteenth century was not simply a conflict in which two British peoples

巨头

paroxysm

,John Thelwall’s Political Ambivalence: Reform and Revolution,ved in their study of ., this movement’s intentions were ‘invariably open to misinterpretation, unintentional or deliberate’.. There were times when reform seemed to mean revolution, not just to overly anxious governments but to the reformers themselves. Thomis and Holt nicely capture the nature of

GEON

,Wondering about Wonders: Paine, Constâncio and ,, 1794–97,mself to be, and against the opinion of all his adversaries, a relentless defender of the cause of truth which, he asserted, could never be injured by fair discussion. This declaration was prompted due to the probable effects of the prosecution filed against Richard Carlile for publishing Thomas Pai

不愿

follicle