Titlebook: Radical Left Parties in Government; The Cases of SYRIZA Yiannos Katsourides Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

follicle

Introduction,rst, issues related to the conceptualization and definition of radical Left parties, one of the most important being the European integration project. Second, this chapter examines the contemporary social, economic, and political conditions that have led to the most recent Left governance in some co

Frequency-Range

ASSAY

口音在加重

,AKEL’s Twofold Legacy,tic/labourite political practice. It then examines in depth the way in which the party changed both ideologically and organizationally subsequent to the dissolution of the socialist bloc. The changes that AKEL introduced opened the way for the party to strive for executive office, as it responded to

Eosinophils

The Journey to Power: One Step Forward?,rtunity and the parties’ themselves. The success of these two parties indicates that government participation is increasingly a viable option for RLPs to influence national (and European) politics, as well as a way to remain relevant in the national political and party systems. Analysis reveals how

mortuary

The Radical Left in Government: Two Steps Back,deological and political positions. It is argued that both parties have been reluctant to launch radical proposals or solutions consistent with their ideology and their past. Endorsing a long-term vision for radical social change, as well as their traditional anti-capitalist positions, while governi

Ascendancy

Conclusions: What to Do?,itizes maintaining power over the parties’ social vision. It addresses a number of important issues consequent to their decision to pursue government, and relevant to their handling of the executive branch. The chapter also highlights some possible implications for future research on radical Left pa

AGGER

,AKEL’s Twofold Legacy,he dissolution of the socialist bloc. The changes that AKEL introduced opened the way for the party to strive for executive office, as it responded to the two dimensions necessary for achieving democratic legitimacy: the subjective (the party’s own initiatives for change) and the objective (whether the other parties perceived the change).

Geyser

伪善