用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Political Asylum Deceptions; The Culture of Suspi Carol Bohmer,Amy Shuman Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Po

[复制链接]
查看: 21019|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:38:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions
副标题The Culture of Suspi
编辑Carol Bohmer,Amy Shuman
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/751/750026/750026.mp4
概述Addresses the issue of asylum and truth from a new angle.Uses extensive case studies to further the reader‘s understanding.Employs an innovative theoretical framework
图书封面Titlebook: Political Asylum Deceptions; The Culture of Suspi Carol Bohmer,Amy Shuman Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Po
描述.This book explores the legitimacy of political asylum applications in the US and UK through an examination of the varieties of evidence, narratives, and documentation with which they are assessed.  Credibility is the central issue in determining the legitimacy of political asylum seekers, but the line between truth and lies is often elusive, partly because desperate people often have to use deception to escape persecution. .The vetting process has become infused with a climate of suspicion that not only assesses the credibility of an applicant’s story and differentiates between the economic migrant and the person fleeing persecution, but also attempts to determine whether an applicant represents a future threat to the receiving country.  This innovative text approaches the problem of deception from several angles, including increased demand for evidence, uses of new technologies to examine applicants’ narratives, assessments of forged documents, attempts to differentiate betweenvictims and persecutors, and ways that cultural misunderstandings can compromise the process.  Essential reading for researchers and students of Political Science, International Studies, Refugee and Migrati
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Political Asylum; Culture of Suspicion; Asylum seekers; Asylum Fraud; Beatrice Munyenyezi; Victim of pers
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-67403-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-67404-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions网络公开度




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions被引频次




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions被引频次学科排名




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions年度引用




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions年度引用学科排名




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions读者反馈




书目名称Political Asylum Deceptions读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:32:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9Political Asylum; Culture of Suspicion; Asylum seekers; Asylum Fraud; Beatrice Munyenyezi; Victim of pers
发表于 2025-3-22 02:21:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:38:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:50:26 | 显示全部楼层
Science and Technology as a Way of Determining Credibility,ppropriate in asylum claims. The body is also increasingly used as evidence, for example, scars resulting from torture, which increasingly require additional documentation, and the requirement for additional certificates or other authoritative expertise has served to shift what counts as truth and evidence in the asylum process.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:57:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:28:26 | 显示全部楼层
tive theoretical framework.This book explores the legitimacy of political asylum applications in the US and UK through an examination of the varieties of evidence, narratives, and documentation with which they are assessed.  Credibility is the central issue in determining the legitimacy of political
发表于 2025-3-22 22:39:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:46:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:55:02 | 显示全部楼层
Documentary Evidence, absence of documents) only exacerbates a situation already complicated by this lack of standardization, the risk applicants take in acquiring or traveling with documents, and the motivation to use fraudulent documents in life-or-death situations.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-14 14:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表