找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Overlooking Conventions; The Trouble With Lin Michael Devitt Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Semantics vs Pragmatics.What is

[复制链接]
楼主: Ford
发表于 2025-3-23 10:14:29 | 显示全部楼层
,Bach and Neale on “What Is Said”,is the content of her intention . a property of the utterance itself. He sees no theoretical role for utterance meanings. In contrast, my theory is committed to utterances, and their expression-tokens, having meanings. I present three reasons for this position. (i) The most basic task for a theory o
发表于 2025-3-23 17:49:00 | 显示全部楼层
Confusion of the Metaphysics of Meaning with the Epistemology of Interpretation,doing so is not a “mere confusion”; the topics are “inextricably linked”. I argue that their reasons for thinking this are flawed. (A) At most they demonstrate an evidential impact of epistemic on metaphysical determination. (B) There is no reason to believe that what a hearer can figure out about w
发表于 2025-3-23 18:35:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:25:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:25:48 | 显示全部楼层
,Saturation and Pragmatism’s Challenge,processes have an appropriately . place in cognitive lives. This requirement has not been met, nor has there been any psycholinguistic attempt to meet it. According to the Developmental Objection it is unlikely to be met. According to the Occamist Objection, we should then prefer a semantic explanat
发表于 2025-3-24 07:11:11 | 显示全部楼层
,Polysemy and Pragmatism’s Challenge,ous phenomena, PRAG, is that a pragmatic modification of meaning typically plays a role in constituting messages. This generates a “psychological-reality requirement”: pragmatic explanation is committed to there being regular subconscious psychological processes in speakers and hearers that are appr
发表于 2025-3-24 13:26:22 | 显示全部楼层
Sub-Sententials: Pragmatics or Semantics?,l, of such speech is actually syntactically elliptical – and hence should be treated semantically, rather than pragmatically. Stainton objects that there is no such ellipsis with the sub-sententials in question. My semantics-oriented approach does not make the syntactic-ellipsis claim and so is not
发表于 2025-3-24 17:08:06 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2021semantic Bias”, or other such strategies for “meaning denialism”. From this novel perspective, the striking examples of context relativity that motivate contextualists and pragmatists typically exemplify semantic rather than pragmatic properties. In particular, polysemous phenomena should typically
发表于 2025-3-24 20:52:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 01:04:19 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 10:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表